InformationTheory.Shannon.Cramer.LC2PhaseC
Cramér lower bound on the canonical infinitePi product #
This file states the Cramér lower bound for the canonical i.i.d. infinite
product setting, reducing the change-of-measure step to the CLT-boundary
headline CramerCltBoundary.cramer_lower_boundary.
The change-of-measure step relates the tilted infinite-product measure
Measure.infinitePi (fun _ : ℕ ↦ μ₀.tilted (lam * Y ·)) to the cylinder tilt of
the un-tilted product measure (Measure.infinitePi (fun _ : ℕ ↦ μ₀)).tilted (...)
on cylinders of width n, identified through the predicate
IsMeasureInfinitePiTiltedEq (defined upstream in CramerBoundaryUpstream.lean).
Main statements #
cramer_lower_infinitePi— the liminf lower bound at thresholdaand optimal tiltlam.cramer_lower_legendre_infinitePi— its Legendre form.cramer_tendsto_infinitePi— the two-sidedTendstoform.
Cramér lower bound and the two-sided limit #
InformationTheory.Shannon.Cramer.TiltedLLN.cramer_lower_infinitePi
sourceThe Cramér lower bound for the canonical i.i.d. product-measure setting
X i ω := Y (ω i) with Y : Ω₀ → ℝ bounded and measurable, on the un-tilted
infinite product μ := Measure.infinitePi (fun _ ↦ μ₀): the asymptotic liminf
lower bound at threshold a and tilt lam.
The optimal-tilt hypothesis h_deriv : deriv (cgf (Y∘·0) (infinitePi μ₀)) lam = a
is required for truth: without it the per-lam bound fails for general a (e.g.
μ₀ = Bernoulli(1/2), Y(0)=0, Y(1)=1, lam=0, a=0.9); the bound is tight
precisely at the optimal tilt, where lam·a − Λ(lam) = cramerRate a. The
non-degeneracy hypothesis hVar and the cobounded-below hypothesis
h_coboundedBelow are regularity preconditions, not part of the proof core.
@audit:ok (body is a verbatim exact of the headline cramer_lower_boundary.
hVar is non-load-bearing: the window-mass ≥ 1/4 core is derived inside the CLT
of the headline, where hVar is consumed only as the non-degeneracy input; at
Var = 0 the tilted sum is a.e. constant and the argument collapses, so granting
hVar alone does not hand over the conclusion.)
Used by
InformationTheory.Shannon.Cramer.TiltedLLN.cramer_lower_legendre_infinitePi
sourceThe Legendre form of cramer_lower_infinitePi, with the conclusion
expressed as -cramerRate a. The Legendre-attainment hypothesis
hlam_opt bridges lam·a − Λ(lam) to cramerRate a; together with h_deriv
(optimal tilt) and hVar (non-degeneracy) these are regularity preconditions,
not part of the proof core.
@audit:ok (threads root preconditions through and rewrites the conclusion via the
hlam_opt Legendre-attainment precondition. hVar, h_deriv, hlam_opt are all
regularity preconditions, no load-bearing core.)
Used by
InformationTheory.Shannon.Cramer.TiltedLLN.cramer_tendsto_infinitePi
sourceCramér's theorem (Tendsto form): the empirical log-tail rate converges
to -cramerRate a. All hypotheses are regularity preconditions or cobounded
side-conditions.
See also cramer_upper_legendre and cramer_lower_legendre_infinitePi.
@audit:ok (genuine le_antisymm-style sandwich of cramer_upper_legendre and
cramer_lower_legendre_infinitePi. All hypotheses are regularity preconditions or
cobounded side-conditions.)
Used by
Predicate interface #
InformationTheory.Shannon.Cramer.TiltedLLN.isMeasureInfinitePiTiltedEq_iff
sourceThe defining shape ∀ a ε, ... ∃ C ... of IsMeasureInfinitePiTiltedEq,
exposed for downstream callers who want to inline the construction.